Alternative work arrangements: Individual, organizational and environmental outcomes
dc.authorid | Yilmaz, Sidika ece/0000-0002-0375-3505 | |
dc.authorid | Hosouli, Sahand/0000-0002-1842-1431 | |
dc.authorid | PANDEY, CHANDAN/0000-0002-9556-257X | |
dc.contributor.author | Yildizhan, Hasan | |
dc.contributor.author | Hosouli, Sahand | |
dc.contributor.author | Yilmaz, Sidika Ece | |
dc.contributor.author | Gomes, Joao | |
dc.contributor.author | Pandey, Chandan | |
dc.contributor.author | Alkharusi, Tarik | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-06T17:38:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-06T17:38:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.description.abstract | Flexible working models are widely used around the world. Furthermore, several countries are currently transitioning to a 4-day workweek. These working models have significant effects on organizational behavior and the environment. The study investigates the employees' attitudes and behaviors toward flexible working and 4-day workweek and the impact on the environment. The semi-structured interview method was used in the study to determine employee attitudes and behaviors; the carbon footprint calculation method was used to determine the environmental impact of a 4-day workweek. According to the study's findings, it has been discovered that there would be a positive impact on socialization, happiness, stress factor, motivation, personal time, mental health, comfort, work-life balance, time-saving, willingness, positive working environment, personal time, and physical health. Furthermore, a 4-day workweek reduced commuting emissions by 20%, resulting in a 6,07 kg tCO(2)e reduction per person. As a result, the study attempted to draw attention holistically to the positive effects of the flexible working model and 4-day workweek. The study is intended to serve as a tool for decision-makers and human resource managers. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21899 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2405-8440 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 11 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 38034699 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85176926016 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21899 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14669/2418 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001114545900001 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Cell Press | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Heliyon | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.snmz | KA_20241211 | |
dc.subject | Flexible working | |
dc.subject | 4-Day workweek | |
dc.subject | Organizational behavior | |
dc.subject | Employee behavior | |
dc.subject | Carbon emission | |
dc.subject | Environmental impact | |
dc.title | Alternative work arrangements: Individual, organizational and environmental outcomes | |
dc.type | Article |