Models used for permeability predictions of nanoporous materials revisited for H2/CH4 and H2/CO2 mixtures

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridcanturk, Behra/0000-0003-1537-7241
dc.authoridGurdal, Yeliz/0000-0002-6245-891X
dc.contributor.authorCanturk, Behra
dc.contributor.authorSalih, Ali
dc.contributor.authorGurdal, Yeliz
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-06T17:38:11Z
dc.date.available2025-01-06T17:38:11Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractHigh throughput screening of new generation nanoporous materials, e.g. metal organic frameworks (MOFs) and zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), for gas mixture separations have produced large amounts of data. Reported gas permeabilities have been mainly calculated using a simplified (approximate) approach. Perme-ability predictions of an alternative method (new method), proposed previously by our group, have shown to significantly improve the predictions of the approximate method for noble gas mixtures. Permeabilities calculated using Onsager coefficients, detailed method, are accepted as correct answers, however constructing Onsager coefficient matrix is computationally cumbersome and not feasible especially for the high throughput screening purposes. In this work, we question in what accuracy the approximate and new methods can predict gas permeabilities and permeation selectivities of gases with respect to the detailed method. We perform Grand Canonical Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics simulations for six ZIFs, namely ZIF-6, ZIF-10, ZIF-60, ZIF-69, ZIF-79, and ZIF-81. Permeabilities of H-2/CH4 and H-2/CO(2 )mixtures are selected as cases, since the dominating interactions of the gas species with the pores of the membranes are different. For the H-2/CH4 mixture, approximate and new methods predict H-2 permeability results of the detailed method sufficiently good. CH4 permeabilities of the approximate method reveal deviations from the correct answers, yet the new method improves the predictions of the approximate approach. In the case of H-2/CO2 mixture, H-2 permeabilities calculated by the approximate approach are in agreement with the detailed method, except for ZIF-60 and ZIF-79. For the CO2 permeability, approximate and new methods give significant deviations from the results calculated using the detailed method.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK); TUBITAK [120Z160]
dc.description.sponsorshipY.G. acknowledges the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) . This study has received funding from the TUBITAK under the 1002 Short Term R & D Funding Program (grant agreement No: 120Z160) . The calculations reported in this paper were performed at the TUBITAK ULAKBIM, High Performance and Grid Computing Center (TRUBA) , based in Turkey.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121463
dc.identifier.issn1383-5866
dc.identifier.issn1873-3794
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85132531437
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121463
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14669/2513
dc.identifier.volume297
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000822699800002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofSeparation and Purification Technology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241211
dc.subjectGrand Canonical Monte Carlo
dc.subjectMolecular Dynamics
dc.subjectZeolitic imidazolate frameworks
dc.subjectGas permeability
dc.titleModels used for permeability predictions of nanoporous materials revisited for H2/CH4 and H2/CO2 mixtures
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu