Forest fees paid to permit mining extractive operations on Turkey's forestlands & the ratio to investments

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridYILDIZ, TASKIN DENIZ/0000-0003-4043-2257
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Taskin Deniz
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-06T17:37:14Z
dc.date.available2025-01-06T17:37:14Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThe fact that mines have to be established at the place where they are located without having a chance to choose a location brings out area usage conflicts with areas that need to be protected. In fact, forestlands are most common in these overlapping areas in Turkey. In order to perform mining activities in this overlapping forestlands, mining enterprises in Turkey receive forest land permit fees (FLPF), reforestation fees, rehabilitation fees + security deposit of conformity to the environment (SDCE), and other fees. In order to determine the share of these costs in mining investments and operating costs (OC) and to bring a solution proposal so that these costs do not pose a risk of loss of the investment in the mining enterprises, questions have been asked to mining enterprises within Turkey using the Survey Monkey program. The averages of all forest fees determined from the answers are proportioned to the mining investment amounts (MIA) and the annual average OC of each mining company responding to the Survey. Thus, the distribution criteria of different forest fees that are required to be paid by the mining enterprises in order to carry out mining operations in the forestlands in Turkey and their distribution on the basis of mineral groups were analyzed. in this calculation, it was suggested that all the fees in Turkey should be reduced to a more reasonable degree by suggesting solutions regarding the calculation method envisaged by the FLPF, which has a very high share. Otherwise, the result of these rates shows that the costs of forest land-use for mining stipulated by the legislation in Turkey are quite high compared to other countries, and that the current mining investments can have difficulty in maintaining their economic operability in the presence of these required costs.
dc.identifier.doi10.24425/gsm.2020.133935
dc.identifier.endpage57
dc.identifier.issn0860-0953
dc.identifier.issn2299-2324
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091634621
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage29
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.24425/gsm.2020.133935
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14669/2155
dc.identifier.volume36
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000577236800002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPolska Akad Nauk, Polish Acad Sciences, Miner & Energy Econ Res Inst Pas
dc.relation.ispartofGospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi-Mineral Resources Management
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241211
dc.subjectcost
dc.subjectfee
dc.subjectinvestment
dc.subjectmining
dc.subjectoperation
dc.titleForest fees paid to permit mining extractive operations on Turkey's forestlands & the ratio to investments
dc.title.alternativeOp?aty le?ne ponoszone za zezwolenie na eksploatacj? górnicz? na terenach le?nych turcji i ich udzia? w inwestycjach górniczych
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu