EVALUATION OF NATURAL GAS STRATEGIES OF TURKEY IN EAST MEDITERRANEAN REGION: A STRENGTHS-WEAKNESSES-OPPORTUNITIES-THREATS AND ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS APPROACH

dc.authoridCetinkaya, Cihan/0000-0002-5899-8438
dc.authoridOzceylan, Eren/0000-0002-5213-6335
dc.authoridgenc, tolga/0000-0002-6134-5964
dc.contributor.authorGenc, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorKabak, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorOzceylan, Eren
dc.contributor.authorCetinkaya, Cihan
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-06T17:43:46Z
dc.date.available2025-01-06T17:43:46Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractDemand for natural gas has severely challenged the world supply among other types of energy sources such as coal, geothermal, nuclear and etc. Natural gas is the most important form of energy because it is clean, abundant, reliable and versatile. Due to the limited and transportable characterizes of natural gas, sharing pipelines for natural gas with other nations can either bring peace and stability or create chaos. To avoid insoluble strategies, it is wry explicit to decide scientifically for these kinds of global issues. To do so, a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) - ANP (Analytic Network Process) integrated approach is presented to evaluate natural gas policies for Turkey in terms of East Mediterranean Region. In the first step, the appropriate strategies, SO (strengths-opportunities), ST (strengths-threats), WO (weaknesses-opportunities) and WT (weaknesses-threats) are determined via SWOT analysis including four criteria, 20 sub-criteria and seven strategies. Due to inability of SWOT analysis to prioritize the criteria and rank the strategies, ANP approach which also considers the dependency between criteria is applied in the second step. Finally, the proposed SWOT-ANP approach is compared with other multi criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques to represent the effectiveness and applicability of the model.
dc.description.sponsorshipBAGEP Award of the Science Academy in Turkey
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors express sincere appreciation to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their efforts to improve the quality of this paper. The authors would also like to thank two experts from Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources for their valuable contributions. Third author was supported by the BAGEP Award of the Science Academy in Turkey.
dc.identifier.doi10.3846/20294913.2016.1253043
dc.identifier.endpage1062
dc.identifier.issn2029-4913
dc.identifier.issn2029-4921
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85047908143
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1041
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1253043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14669/2789
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000442131100012
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherVilnius Gediminas Tech Univ
dc.relation.ispartofTechnological and Economic Development of Economy
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241211
dc.subjectnatural gas
dc.subjectstrategic policy
dc.subjectevaluation
dc.subjectANP
dc.subjectSWOT
dc.titleEVALUATION OF NATURAL GAS STRATEGIES OF TURKEY IN EAST MEDITERRANEAN REGION: A STRENGTHS-WEAKNESSES-OPPORTUNITIES-THREATS AND ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS APPROACH
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar