Nennioglu, Ahmet KemalAbdulvahitoglu, AsliDal, Abdurrahim2025-01-062025-01-0620240029-80181873-525810.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.1192612-s2.0-85203820605https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119261https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14669/3164Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques, it is possible to thoroughly examine all available options and determine the most desirable ones. However, the prevalence of these methods, which employ various computational changes, can result in disparate outcomes. Therefore, the final rankings should be as dependable and consistent as possible. In this study, the consistency of the findings obtained from the TOPSIS, COPRAS, MAUT, and MOOSRA methodologies was investigated in the real-world problem of Unmanned Underwater Vehicle Control Method Selection by forming decision matrices through simulations.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessUnmanned underwater vehicleTrajectory trackingControl methodsAHPMCDMArticleQ1312WOS:001317728600001N/A